Compliance Professional Resources    David DeMartino    212.257.6500 ext.1    ddemartino@compliancepros.net 


July 2009   
This issue's articles:

Effective Recruiting Practices During Turbulent Economic Times/Preparing for an Improved Economy
Managing Rising Compliance Costs
Implementing AML Technology

 
Effective Recruiting Practices During Turbulent Economic Times/Preparing for an Improved Economy


As we wind our way through what will probably be remembered as the WORST economic downturn since the Great Depression, it is important to take note that like every economic cycle, this too will pass.

It is important for organizations to remember that they not only must survice the economic downturn, but prepare for better times. One of THE most important issues that contribute to survival and growth of an organization is the manner in which they manage recruitment and retention of staff.

The lack of a strong retention policy, coupled with drastic layoffs and followed by haphazard hiring polices can create a reputational risk issue which will take years to recover from.

Let's examine an issue that can contribute to reputational risk problems: Layoffs.

Layoffs are a normal part of economic survival for many companies. Unfortunately, as sales and revenue decrease, most entities utilize staff reduction as a method of increasing shareholder value or cutting losses. While this in and of itself is not terrible, all too often, companies develop a reputation for being "quick to hire and quick to fire". They become known for not placing value on the contribution of staff. Organizations that develop this reputation may find themselves in a difficult position when they want to attract talent during strong economic cycles. Hand in hand with the layoff issue is the problem of RETENTION. All too often, once a layoff occurs, an organization finds themselves in the position of losing many staff members that they may not necessarily have wanted to lose.

Recruitment and Retention Strategies in an Improving Economy

Be prepared for higher turnover and greater difficulty in recruiting based on several factors:
  • Improving job market
  • Staff playing catch up for low raises/bonuses
  • Staff reacting to poor treatment/real or imagined (layoffs, OT, morale issues, etc). A recent Survey showed that 51% of people surveyed indicated that they wanted to leave their job. 75% said they anticipated leaving within the coming year.
  • Shortages based on declining population and fewer trained people. As a result of the recession, fewer companies hired entry level staff. This can create a shortage of "bench strength."
Turnover, as we all know is extremely costly...estimates are that the turnover of one job can cost 1.5 times an employees annual salary (this factors in separation costs, loss of productivity, OT for remaining workers, temporary staff, replacement fees (I know this sounds strange coming from a recruiter.)

What does all of this mean? From an HR perspective, you are going to be facing two key challenges in the recovering economy—retention and recruiting—and they go hand in hand.

Retention of existing staff must be your first line of defense in your recruitment strategy. If you are able to maintain a workforce that is relatively stable, it will allow you to grow your businesses with the least amount of disruption. In addition, if you are RETAINING staff, your organization develops a reputation as being an attractive place to work. Thus, even in a challenged recruiting market, you will be able to attract what few candidates are out there. Additionally, your existing staff will be your best recruiting sources.

Let's discuss some additional recruitment issues:

Although effective and efficient recruiting practices should always be employed, a period of economic challenges, such as we are now experiencing, is a most appropriate time to review and modify your current practices as may be required.

When an opening occurs due either to a resignation, transfer or expansion, we suggest asking and answering the following questions:
  • How urgent are our needs and do we need to fill the position now? If not, what is our preferred timing?
  • Do we have a current and accurate position description?
  • Do we have a current and realistic compensation range for the position?
  • If so, have we posted the position internally and explored all possible internal candidates?
Having resolved the above 4 questions and determining that you need to go to the outside market to staff a position, there is an additional important issue that you need to resolve – should I attempt to recruit on my own or should I employ the services of a qualified recruitment firm?

Let's explore the first scenario—you want to recruit on your own.
  • Do you have the time and resources to sort through a voluminous amount of resumes you will likely receive from "active" candidates – those currently unemployed or seeking a change?
  • Do you have the time, resources and capabilities to tap "passive" candidates – those individuals not currently seeking new opportunities? Advertising alone will not effectively target those potential candidates.
  • Can you effectively and efficiently target those candidates you want to see and establish timely dates/times for first round interviews? It is critical that you respond to each and every candidate submission in a timely fashion.


  • Given all the above, will you have the time/resources to do that, as well as to communicate again with candidates interviewed? Candidates who are not treated correctly and with respect during tough economic times will remember that when conditions turn around.
During tough economic times with a large and growing pool of unemployed and in some cases, desperate potential candidates, the proper use of your internal recruiting resources is critical. Having your resources pushed to the limit and beyond will not produce a favorable result in filling your open positions. In addition, the undesirable result of leaving unfavorable impressions of your institution with large numbers of potential candidates is very possible.

In order to help overcome these hurdles, partnering with a capable and professional recruitment firm that specializes in your industry could prove invaluable. In order for the partnership to be successful, the recruitment firm must be prepared to add value to the process. To determine if a firm will add value, ask them the following questions and ensure you are satisfied with their responses:
  • Do you specialize in my industry?
  • What is your track record?
  • Will you provide references?
  • Do you have the capabilities to pursue active and passive candidates?
  • What recruitment methodologies do you use?
  • Will you pre-screen and interview prospective candidates before submitting their credentials to me? Getting flooded with paper for unqualified candidates from recruiters will leave you no better off than recruiting yourself. There are some recruiters who will not even speak with a candidate before submitting them to a potential employer, let alone attempt to pre-qualify them.
  • Will the recruiter negotiate compensation and other terms with a successful candidate?
  • If necessary, will the recruiter perform other services, such as reference checks, background checks, etc?
  • Is the firm full-service, offering full time, part time and contract staffing services?
  • Does the firm offer a variety of search types/fee options (contingency, retained, etc.) and do they have the flexibility to meet my financial requirements?
  • Will the firm, through its value-added philosophy, save me time and money and get me the quality staff I require quickly?
Remember, to achieve the desired results it is imperative that you partner with the firm selected.
  • Only submit listings once you have determined that you do need to fill the position now and after you have exhausted internal candidates.
  • Submit an accurate position description and current salary range. Be realistic with your requirements (compensation, experience level, etc.)
  • Specify what the recruitment/hiring steps are and what approvals are required. This will help the recruiter manage a candidate's expectations.
  • Respond quickly to all submissions—positive or negative. Please remember, there are human candidates on the other end waiting!
  • Establish timely interviews and communicate the results to the recruiter.
  • Keep the recruiter informed of decisions, delays, etc.
We should never forget that our commodity is a human being and they should always be treated with the honesty, respect and dignity they deserve, but even more so during these troubled economic times. They will remember how they were treated long after the event has passed.

Back to top

 
Managing Rising Compliance Costs


Regulators are constantly raising the bar on financial institutions. Today the cost of compliance is a significant line item on the P&L and the penalty for non-compliance is not just the "cost of being in business" anymore! Tolerance of non-compliance is very low and penalties very high. Increased regulatory scrutiny and large fines have made BSA/AML compliance more important than ever. You must have a strong risk-based program with proof of consistent compliance, which takes continuous, rigorous oversight and time-consuming documentation.

In the current economic and regulatory landscape, as banks are setting their goals for 2009 and onwards, managing rising compliance cost is one of the biggest challenges, especially for small and mid-sized banks. As per a recent Deloitte Survey (2008): Top Banks' Compliance spending grew 159 percent over the last 5 years. 60 percent of spending goes to staff compensation, while only 18 percent is dedicated to IT.

Today the Chief Compliance Officers are forced to re-examine their CCO's TCO (Chief Compliance Officer's Total Cost of Operations). CCOs are deconstructing their compliance programs through the lens of process management. These elements are:
  • Understanding end-to-end compliance processes, especially for AML transaction monitoring and OFAC account "scrubs."
  • Automating repetitive, uniform activities.
  • Separating clerical tasks from analytical tasks.
  • Separating analytical tasks from executive tasks.
  • Separating activities into onshore "versus" offshore staffing.
When it comes to offshore outsourcing, the stage has been set by the leading financial institutions, several Fortune 100 companies and Big Four accounting firms, who have established captive business process outsourcing (BPO) units in lower cost geographies around the world, especially in India, Philippines and EMEA region. These leading organizations utilize their offshore professionals at lower rates to supplement their existing staffing needs in the U.S. Their mantra is all processes that can be digitized can be delivered in an offshore environment. According to a Deloitte study, Global Financial Services Offshoring Report 2007, over 75% of major financial institutions report offshoring a portion of their operations.

Over the last few years, several large financial institutions have created teams of compliance professionals in their captive BPOs who are now assisting the CCO's team in the U.S., in executing BSA/ AML related tasks. These banks have discovered that outsourcing/ off-shoring of certain BSA/AML compliance activities reduces the workload on their staff, effectively managing the CCO's TCO and also leveraging the time arbitrage due to different time zones.

The major and consistent benefits of offshore outsourcing enjoyed by these organizations include:
  • Reduced operational costs.
  • Converting fixed costs into variable costs.
  • Significantly improving profit margins.
  • Increased flexibility and scalability of operations.
  • Increased focus on Core Banking Competencies.
  • Access to global human capital at low cost.
  • Significant savings on HR and senior management time.
Certain AML transaction monitoring tasks that have been identified as good candidates for offshore outsourcing are:

Account Opening
  • Verify CIP Data.
  • Perform CDD/EDD.
Transaction Profiling & Risk Assessment.
  • Build Normal & Expected Transaction Patterns.
  • Account Profile Reviews.
Cases & Alert Processing
  • Investigate system generated alerts.
  • Provide observations/disposition of the case.
OFAC
  • Investigate system generated alerts.
  • Provide observations/disposition of the case.
Management Reporting—MIS
  • Branch Level Reporting.
  • Head Office Reporting.
Where the larger banks have created their captive BPOs in low cost geographies, other banks have struggled with setting up their own captive BPOs due to either lack of expertise or economies of scale.



Today, there are third party service providers like Hanagrove LLC, a subsidiary of Integrated Compliance Solutions LLC, who can assist small and midsized banks avail the cost arbitrage that the larger banks are leveraging on a turn-key basis.

One of the most common challenges faced by an institution outsourcing work to third party service provider to an offshore location is regulatory acceptance and navigating regulatory concerns around data security and privacy issues. It's not easy! However, the good news is that this is not a new phenomenon. The large banks have been executing offshoring of AML transaction monitoring through captive BPOs as well as third party service providers for many years. Over the last few years, many of these set ups have been satisfactorily examined by the U.S. Regulators. In addition, the U.S. Regulators have issued several interagency guidelines on these issues:
  • OCC: Published Bulletin 2002 – 16: Bank use of foreign third party Providers.
  • FDIC 2004: Offshore Outsourcing of Data Services by Insured Institutions and Associated Consumer Privacy Risks.
One common question that a CCO should ask is how difficult is it to convert from in-house compliance staffing to outsourced and offshore staffing? The answer is it's not difficult. Many of these banks have been outsourcing their compliance function or certain elements of it to U.S. based service providers, like ICS for over a decade. Offshoring the functions are simplest for the activities which are automated, and those benefits are generally easier to capture. As the processes are divided and subdivided, everyone sees more clearly how certain tasks can be centralized, and if they can be centralized, then they can be more closely measured for productivity, quality and performance.

The twin goals are to (i) drive down the costs of the overall AML program, while also (ii) making it more effective overall. Every bank wants to "do the right thing." They do not want to face the reputation risk of missing something. At the same time, they just want to be sure they are controlling the costs, so they also provide a solid return to their shareholders.

Back to top

 
Implementing AML Technology


By Gregory Boston
KBC Bank
Director-Operations


Implementing a new Compliance OFAC application can be time consuming and cumbersome for an organization. KBCNY just recently converted a legacy OFAC filtering system to a new state of the art application, not without issues. However, key to the success of the project implementation was having an independent third party consultant. During our initial conversion discussions it was decided that two project managers take the lead, one from KBCNY and another from the vendor. This was then supplemented by an independent consultant who participated as the mediator and project tracker for all stages of the project implementation. It was extremely critical to find someone with the necessary expertise and who had an independent view so as to not compromise the final results of any issues that may arise.

Our search was answered with an individual with over 10 years experience and a pioneer in the field of compliance knowhow and technology to boot. A standard conversion from start to finish from a legacy system to an upgrade from the same vendor normally is at minimum a six month project. Here KBCNY was faced with a conversion from a legacy system to a new vendor platform with all interfaces needing to be developed. Imagine trying to finish a project of a different kind in 6 months per a management directive with multiple personalities and disciplines. After carefully reviewing the task it was mutually agreed to by both vendor and KBCNY that this go between person was critical to the successful implementation.

KBCNY began the project in late November 2008, a time where the rest of the world is beginning their winter holidays. An IT mandated freeze on new software installs for the month of December did not give KBC much time to complete the project within the six month window. Countless weekends and everyday user acceptance testing under the guiding force of our mediator (champion) allowed us to circumvent any differences between all parties, to keep the project on track. I am glad to say that KBCNY put the new OFAC application into production on May 18, 2009 without a hitch, one month ahead of schedule.

The moral of this success story is you cannot always do it alone; expertise and industry knowledge from a different perspective sheds positive light on possible hurdles. (They are always there, you need to manage them.)



Back to top

 
About CPR

CPR is a unique regulatory compliance services firm. A unique blend of compliance recruiting services (executive, permanent, and temporary), and compliance consulting services. Add in managing partners that have essentially pioneered the industry, this makes CPR clearly a leader in the Regulatory Compliance service space.

Our commitment to excellence in all phases of our business is unparalleled. As it relates to recruiting, we will provide you with the best most skilled candidates, we work tirelessly to get the right person, after we completely understand your needs. Our Compliance consultant services are surgically focused on getting the job done as expeditiously as possible, and without crippling your budget.

We only provide seasoned and experienced consultants, always with the correct skill sets. Our goal is to get it right the first time.


www.compliancepros.net